top of page

Features ≠ Capabilities in Legal Tech

  • Writer: Shantanu Singh
    Shantanu Singh
  • Jun 25
  • 1 min read

Updated: Jun 30

Comparison graphic showing features vs. capabilities in legal tech. Features are labeled as “tick boxes,” capabilities as “drive value.”

When evaluating legal tech capabilities, especially contract automation tools, it’s easy to be dazzled by a list of features. At Obviate, we’ve highlighted essential contract-redlining features that our users love:


✔️ Flag indemnity clauses

✔️ Suggest edits

✔️ Compare to fallback (i.e., your approved language baseline)


These are undeniably valuable—but they are features. Check-boxes. What really drives business outcomes? Capabilities.


FEATURES tick boxes; CAPABILITIES drive value.


⚙️ What’s the difference?


Feature: flags a deviation in your contract.


Capability: explains why that language adds risk, what exposures it creates, and how it compares to your fallback language.


Capabilities go deeper—they inform and empower. They don’t just highlight issues; they walk you through the implications and provide mitigation strategies that align with your risk posture.


🤝 From Features to Capabilities in Legal Tech


Feature: may suggest edits.


Capability: acts based on your unique risk assessment, mitigation preferences, and negotiation strategy—tailored to your industry and business model.


Obviate’s autonomous contract review agents understand the mission: manage compliance, reduce risk, and speed up reviews. We don’t just highlight problems—we provide judgment-aligned guidance you can trust, apply, and explain.


Ready to level up?


If you're looking for both speed and depth in your contract reviews—without sacrificing risk clarity—Obviate can help.


✅ Instant redlines

✅ Structured risk analysis

✅ Playbook-aligned edits—no prompts or training required


Sign up for a free trial today at https://www.obviate.ai/get-started.


bottom of page